By Midnight Voice | Sunday, June 1st, 2008 at 6:14 pm
Here in the UK, the behavioural targeting company Phorm claims to have partnered with the three major ISPs — BT, Virgin and TalkTalk, who together account for about 70% of the UK Internet Service Provider market -– to install their equipment right inside the ISPs’ server rooms so they can profile all our surfing, and serve us adverts based on what our interests seem to be.
Those of us who find this pretty intrusive, and do not want our privacy compromised in this way, are mounting a highly vocal campaign against Phorm, in which the website BadPhorm is at the forefront. Visit the BadPhorm website here.
As Phorm has millions of dollars, and we don’t even have a fighting fund, you’d think it would be a pretty one-sided fight, but so far we seem to be winning. The battle isn’t over yet, but we have some pretty powerful opinion that Phorm is actually illegal, and certainly none of the above ISPs have yet dared to start their long-threatened, but now long-delayed “trials” of the “service.”
You will find me on BadPhorm, being vocal, as Midnight_Voice. Why the pseudonym? Well, we all pretty much have pseudonyms. Not because we are afraid to stand up and be counted under our real names, in most cases –- some of our identities are hardly secret at all — but just to indicate that our privacy is important to us.
So that’s the sort of people we are. But what sort of people are we up against? Well, here’s a clue. The Washington Post carried this article:
FTC Wants to Know What Big Brother Knows About You
‘Behavioral Targeting’ on Web Is Debated
By Peter Whoriskey | Thursday, May 22, 2008….”The problem for newspapers is that a story headlined ‘Two Dead in Baghdad’ isn’t very product-friendly,” said Kent Ertugrul, chief executive of Phorm, a behavioral targeting company working with British newspapers. “But if you know who is looking at the page, that’s where the opportunity is.”
Nice man, huh? Just in time for Memorial Day too. But he’s quite right — who would advertise opposite that story, if they knew it was breaking? Morticians? Cemeteries? Ossuaries?
But Kent make no bones about it -– he has the solution -– don’t sell according to WHERE the reader is looking, but sell according to WHO the reader looking IS. And sell based on having tracked his or her Internet usage, so you know what that reader is interested in. Whether or not the article beside it kind of takes the gilt off the gingerbread….
But it got me thinking. How might that play out in real life? With Phorm, or with Nebuad, which is pretty much the same? And would anyone who had a heart really want to do it? Or would they be blinded by those dollar signs? Ugh…
After which the following verse woke me at 3 am, and just demanded to be put on paper. See what you think…
On The Monetization Of Grief“Two Dead in Baghdad” – Chuck and Earl, both 21 They killed our lovely boy – some roadside bomb The cutting’s in the scrapbook that I made The Advert knows my wants and my desires Bridal Dresses – Ellie did stop by Cameras, of course. Until last Fall, when we lost Art. It’s quieter now. Prescription meds are mostly what I need “Two Dead in Baghdad” – I can read the screen By Midnight_Voice |
Related ADMC articles:
|
Comments: 3 Comments »» Send a link: Tell a friend about this. Link to this post: Permalink Send us your link: Trackback link |
Filed under: Internet Tags: , advert, adverts, Bad Phorm, battle, BT, fight, illegal, interest, Internet, ISP, ISPs, Phorm, profile, Provider, Providers, Service, surfing, Talk Talk, UK, United Kingdom, Virgin |
